Skip to content

M4 Max (32-core GPU) vs RTX 4090 for local AI

M4 Max (32-core GPU) runs 36 of 74 open models well and RTX 4090 runs 35. Here is every model on both, with the grade and the speed you would get.

Runs more models well (grade B or better)

M4 Max (32-core GPU)

M4 Max (32-core GPU): 36 · RTX 4090: 35

Faster on the models both run

RTX 4090 · ×2.4

Median speed ratio over 35 models both load fully in memory.

Specs that matter

M4 Max (32-core GPU) RTX 4090
Memory compared36 GB24 GB
Memory bandwidth410 GB/s1008 GB/s
Memory typeUnified (shared with the system)Dedicated VRAM
BackendMetalCUDA
Released20242022

Every model on both

Grade and output speed at Q4_K_M with an 8K context; green marks the better of the two.

ModelECIM4 Max (32-core GPU)RTX 4090
moonshotKimi K3157F—F—
deepseekDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813155F—F—
deepseekDeepSeek V4.1 Flash155F—F—
deepseekDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731154F—F—
zaiGLM 5.3 Flash152F—F—
zaiGLM 5.2152F—F—
moonshotKimi K2.6151F—F—
tInkling Small150F—F—
moonshotKimi K2.7 Code150F—F—
zaiGLM 5.1150F—F—
qwenQwen3.8 27B149B~19 t/sA~37 t/s
deepseekDeepSeek V4 Pro149F—F—
tInkling149F—F—
moonshotKimi K2.5148F—F—
minimaxMiniMax M3147F—F—
minimaxMiniMax M2.5147F—F—
qwenQwen3.5 397B A17B147F—F—
qwenQwen3.6 27B147B~20 t/sA~39 t/s
deepseekDeepSeek V3.2146F—F—
nvidiaNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B146F—F—
deepseekDeepSeek V4 Flash146F—F—
moonshotKimi K2 Thinking146F—F—
minimaxMiniMax M2.7146F—F—
zaiGLM 5146F—F—
deepseekDeepSeek V3.2 Exp145F—F—
qwenQwen3.6 35B A3B144S~96 t/sB~340 t/s
qwenQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507144F—F—
zaiGLM 4.7144F—F—
googleGemma 4 31B143B~18 t/sB~34 t/s
qwenQwen3.5 35B A3B143S~96 t/sB~344 t/s
googleGemma 4 26B A4B142S~79 t/sS~236 t/s
mistralMistral Medium 3.5 128B141F—F—
moonshotKimi K2140F—F—
openaigpt-oss 120b140F—F—
deepseekDeepSeek V3.1140F—F—
qwenQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507140S~86 t/sS~274 t/s
qwenQwen3.5 9B139S~49 t/sS~114 t/s
qwenQwen3 235B A22B 2507139F—F—
openaigpt-oss 20b138S~92 t/sS~314 t/s
qwenQwen3 30B A3B 2507137S~86 t/sS~274 t/s
mistralMagistral Small 2506133A~22 t/sS~44 t/s
mistralMistral Small 3.2 24B132A~22 t/sS~44 t/s
mistralMagistral Small 2509131A~22 t/sS~44 t/s
microsoftPhi-4 14B130A~32 t/sS~68 t/s
metaLlama 4 Scout 17B 16E130F—F—
metaLlama 3.3 70B127F—D~2 t/s
metaLlama 3.1 8B117S~51 t/sS~121 t/s
cohereCommand A+—F—F—
qwenQwen3.8 Flash Next—F—F—
qwenQwen3.5 122B A10B—F—F—
mistralMistral Small 4 119B—F—F—
qwenQwen3 Coder Next—F—F—
moonshotKimi Linear 48B A3B—F—C~107 t/s
ai2Olmo 3.1 32B Think—B~17 t/sB~32 t/s
nvidiaNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B—B~85 t/sC~175 t/s
zaiGLM 4.7 Flash—S~95 t/sS~333 t/s
cohereNorth Mini Code 1.0—S~89 t/sS~293 t/s
ibmGranite 4.2 30B—B~18 t/sB~35 t/s
mistralDevstral Small 2 24B—A~22 t/sS~44 t/s
mistralMinistral 3 14B—A~35 t/sS~74 t/s
googleGemma 4 12B—A~40 t/sS~88 t/s
mistralMinistral 3 8B—S~49 t/sS~114 t/s
ibmGranite 4.2 8B—S~46 t/sS~106 t/s
googleGemma 4 E4B—S~54 t/sS~130 t/s
ai2Olmo 3 7B—S~44 t/sS~100 t/s
googleGemma 4 E2B—S~74 t/sS~210 t/s
qwenQwen3.5 4B—S~78 t/sS~230 t/s
mistralMinistral 3 3B—S~83 t/sS~256 t/s
ibmGranite 4.2 3B—S~81 t/sS~249 t/s
metaLlama 3.2 3B—S~84 t/sS~265 t/s
huggingfaceSmolLM3 3B—S~90 t/sS~298 t/s
liquidLFM2.5 2.6B—S~101 t/sS~377 t/s
qwenQwen3.5 2B—S~113 t/sS~496 t/s
qwenQwen3.5 0.8B—S~145 t/sS~1,133 t/s

Estimates from published specs and measurements, calibrated per backend. Your drivers, settings and runtime change the real numbers.

Change memory, context or quantOpen this comparison in the interactive tool.